This article originally appeared in the winter 2024-25 issue of TASA INSIGHT. Dr. Quintin Shepherd is the superintendent of Pflugerville ISD. He works as an adjunct professor at University of Houston-Victoria and has served as a superintendent for the past 19 years in three states.
Most veteran business leaders remember the era of “Chainsaw Al” Dunlap, a once-celebrated CEO known for ruthless cost-cutting and headline-grabbing turnarounds. At companies including Scott Paper and then Sunbeam in the late 1990s, Al Dunlap was touted as a heroic figure. He was the unstoppable force who would swoop in, take drastic action, and produce miraculous short-term results. His scrupulous layoffs and plant closures were hailed as part of a “magic formula” for boosting profits.
That formula, however, was fraught with hidden risks. Dunlap’s leadership style often alienated employees, and his obsession with short-term stock value led to questionable accounting practices that eventually caught up with him and the company. Sunbeam collapsed under the weight of those decisions … leaving tarnished reputations and broken promises in its wake.
While it might be tempting to read these headlines as a relic of 1990s corporate culture, the themes that drove “Chainsaw Al” to infamy transcend a particular industry. School and district leaders, too, can fall prey to the allure of quick wins and the myth of a “heroic turnaround.” When we romanticize a single figure’s ability to magically fix long-standing systemic issues, we risk overlooking the collaborative, long-range approaches that yield sustainable results.
The Evolution (and Romanticization) of School Turnaround
Poignantly, this is vital work in rather challenging times. School turnaround and district turnaround initiatives are essential when student performance indicators, graduation rates, or teacher retention metrics consistently lag. For instance, federal programs such as the School Improvement Grants (SIG) of the 2010s poured billions of dollars into struggling campuses, aiming to spark rapid gains in test scores and other key markers. According to the U.S. Department of Education, more than 1,300 schools were funded by SIG at the program’s peak, with many communities championing the idea of bold, transformative leadership to rescue failing schools.
In theory, the necessity of turnaround is compelling. Communities desire effective leaders who can quickly address underperformance, low morale, and resource deficits. Elected boards and superintendents are under immense pressure to demonstrate evidence of improvement. This climate fosters an appetite for “superstar” school leaders who promise dramatic improvements on a compressed timeline.
How Turnaround Became Romanticized
Romanticization happens when a concept is glamorized to the point that its complexities and inherent risks are downplayed or ignored. In school districts, this often emerges in the narrative of a singular, heroic principal or superintendent who can rewrite an entire system’s fate by sheer force of will. Media attention, board endorsements and community hopes can feed into this storyline.
The impulse is understandable. After all, quick success stories feel good, are memorable and stories are easy to repeat, and district stakeholders yearn for reassurance that real change is possible.
Yet, as the cautionary tale of “Chainsaw Al” shows, heroic narratives about turnaround often gloss over deeper, systemic issues. In education, these might include entrenched inequities in funding, persistent teacher shortages, or community challenges outside the school’s control.
The Obvious Lessons from “Chainsaw Al”
- Short-term vs. long-term: Dunlap’s fixation on near-term shareholder returns parallels how some schools chase immediate test score bumps without addressing core instructional or cultural needs.
- Hero CEO (or principal) myth: Just as Sunbeam’s stakeholders put too much faith in one person, many school turnaround efforts center on a single dynamic leader rather than building sustained capacity across the faculty and staff.
- Eroding trust: When the results don’t last (or seem manipulated) stakeholders lose faith. Opaque decision-making or toxic work environments in education can erode trust faster than any short-lived academic gains can restore it.
Transformative Lessons for Education Leaders
Genuine school turnaround is rarely a solitary endeavor. Rather than hinging on a single heroic figure, effective change emerges when teachers, administrators, families, and students collaborate toward common goals. This systemic, collaborative approach acknowledges the complexity of educational ecosystems and recognizes that distributed leadership, targeted coaching, and ongoing professional learning communities (PLCs) can have a cumulative impact over time. When these stakeholders work together, there is a stronger collective commitment to improvement, and innovative ideas are more likely to take root. Top-down mandates alone are not enough; it’s the synergy of shared ownership and continual feedback that produces enduring progress.
Another vital lesson for education leaders is to balance short-term indicators of success with long-term institutional growth. In the same way that a CEO might deliver a short-lived surge in profits through cost cutting, a school leader may witness a temporary rise in test scores by focusing exclusively on quick instructional fixes. However, this can obscure more systemic issues, such as insufficient resources, inequities among student groups, or misaligned teaching practices. Sustainable success calls for leaders to set carefully considered goals that encompass academic outcomes alongside broader measures of school culture, equity, and student well-being. Data remains an essential tool, but it should be interpreted within a holistic framework that values genuine learning and healthier communities over immediate, and perhaps fragile, gains.
Clear, transparent communication underpins all of these endeavors. When teachers, parents and students suspect that key decisions are made behind closed doors or that unfavorable data is being hidden, they quickly become disillusioned with the leadership’s agenda. If turnaround leaders aim to build authentic trust, they must be open about both the challenges they face and the strategies they plan to implement. Inviting community members into the conversation, whether through town halls, faculty advisory panels, or student input sessions helps dispel feelings of uncertainty and fosters a shared sense of responsibility. The more that leaders articulate how and why changes are occurring, the greater the willingness of the school community to rally behind these improvements.
Ultimately, capacity-building is what distinguishes a fleeting turnaround from long-lasting organizational progress. Leaders who prioritize teacher development, invest in robust leadership pipelines, and institute continuous improvement systems are planting seeds of success that will outlive their own tenure. These investments ensure that once an effective leader departs, a school or district will not regress to previous performance levels, but rather continue to thrive. By empowering educators and strengthening collective capacity, these school systems become more adaptive and resilient, avoiding the pitfalls of overreliance on any single, charismatic leader.
- Systemic, collaborative approaches: True improvement emerges from system-wide collaboration: teachers, staff, families, and students co-labor in the endeavor. Instead of leaning on one “heroic” figure, districts should focus on distributed leadership models, continuous coaching, and PLCs.
- Short-term data vs. long-haul progress: Temporary spikes in test scores might placate a community or a school board for a season, but are they masking deeper issues? Sustainable growth comes when leaders set strategic goals that integrate academic outcomes, culture-building, equity initiatives and student well-being.
- Communication and transparency: Like Sunbeam’s stakeholders, teachers and parents grow wary if they feel shut out or misled. Turnaround leaders succeed when they prioritize transparent communication, are open about challenges, and invite genuine input from the entire community.
- Capacity-building over complacency: The best turnaround leaders aren’t just focused on short-term goals; they also invest in teacher development, leadership pipelines, and continuous improvement structures. When that leader eventually moves on, the system is stronger than they found it.
A Final Note: Pacing for Real Change
Our greatest danger in romanticizing turnarounds is that we might forget the marathon nature of true educational reform. Turnaround remains essential, but it must be undertaken with care, collaboration, and a steadfast eye on the long-term health of the institution.
The sign of a true turnaround is not how fast you cut the fat, but how well you build the muscle that sustains growth.
If nothing else, that is the lesson we must remember … because every child, every teacher, and every community deserves more than a glamorous short-term fix. They deserve a future built on honest, enduring transformation.
MORE LEADERSHIP PERSPECTIVES
